
| A Very British Family: The Trevelyans and Their World Laura Trevelyan, (London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd, 2006), 256 pages Reviewed by: Robert Whitaker, University of Texas at Austin Representing more “than just a self-indulgent memoir of dim and distant relatives,” Laura Trevelyan’s A Very British Family gives an intimate account of her family’s period of social and political preeminence in Britain during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Utilizing a mixture of correspondences, diary entries and various secondary works, the author creates a brief biographic portrait of each of the Trevelyan clan’s most famous members: the reformer Charles Edward, the radical scholar George Otto, the playboy politician Charles Philips, the master historian George Macaulay, and the Goethe obsessed firefighter Charles Humphry. In addition to providing a chronology of each man’s life, these biographies place their subjects within a wider historical context, determining how they helped to either “shape” or “chronicle” British history. The book also depicts the family life of each man, describing their relationships with one another as well as with their spouses and children. Trevelyan’s description of the rise and ultimate decline of her family through the generations makes A Very British Family a delightful read that manages to avoid outright ancestor worship. Motivated to write the book in order to overcome her ignorance of her family’s history, Laura Trevelyan attempts to remain objective when considering the lives of her predecessors. Fortunately for the author, the chronically self-absorbed and self-important nature of her forefathers makes her job rather easy. One cannot help but feel annoyed with the self-righteous outbursts of Charles Edward during his time with the East India Company or despise him for his belief in the “usefulness” of the Irish Famine. Similarly, one grows weary with the political careers of George Otto and Charles Philips, who abandoned their initiatives whenever they encountered opposition and never attained a status commiserate with their advantages. The author saves her most scathing remarks for her grandfather Charles Humphry, who avoided work until his late twenties and spent most of his marriage trying to seduce younger women. For G.M. Trevelyan, however, the author adopts the perspective of David Cannadine, championing her great grandfather’s works while only briefly mentioning his less than charming personality. For all these faults, the Trevelyans remain a praiseworthy family. Members of the “aristocracy of exceptional talent,” the Trevelyans brought a middle class mentality with them to the ranks of the established class. Embodying hard work, integrity, and duty, the Trevelyans consistently made use of their position within the social hierarchy to bring about reform. Despite his controversial opinions regarding India and Ireland, few worked harder than Charles Edward to improve the lot of both regions. While George Otto may be criticized for his lack of direct impact as a politician, his ideas as a radical satirist and scholar indirectly influenced several key figures, including Theodore Roosevelt. George’s son Charles Philips, though easily the most self-absorbed out of all the Trevelyans depicted in the book, cared deeply for the well-being of industrial workers. His brother, G.M. Trevelyan, received harsh criticism from traditional academics for writing unscholarly works, yet did more than anyone else in the early twentieth century to raise the general public’s interest in history. Finally, Charles Humphry, the lazy and relatively obscure Trevelyan, bravely worked as a volunteer firefighter during the Blitz and played a key role in the translation of German Enigma communications as part of Project Ultra. Though Laura Trevelyan succeeds in relating the dual nature of the Trevelyan line (reform-minded prigs) during their time in the nation’s spotlight, some of the author’s promised “insights” fail to materialize by book’s end. For instance, Trevelyan never provides a satisfactory amount of information regarding the wives and children of the men discussed in the book. The author’s grandmother, Molly Bennett (wife of Charles Humphry) remains the only person other than the five principals that receives a significant amount of discussion. Indeed, the family’s estate at Wallington demands more attention from the author than several of the men and women listed on the family tree at the beginning of the book. In addition, Trevelyan continually relies on the insights and analysis of other writers in order to fill out her work. For every long quote from a diary or correspondence, there seems to be an equally long quote from a secondary source. While this is, to a certain extent, to be expected, one wishes that someone so close to the source material could feel free to present their own opinions rather than relying on those of others. Despite these faults, A Very British Family remains a useful work for anyone with an interest in the Trevelyans or the dynamics of upper class intellectual life in Britain during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. |
| © Copyright 2007-08 British Scholar. All rights reserved. |